Server Fault is a question and answer site for system and network administrators. It only takes a minute to sign up. Connect and share knowledge within a single location that is structured and easy to search. Recently I have gone through some articles regarding Windows Server core installation, which is very light weight server and consume low resources when compared with full installation.
Because, generally the server will be in log off mode and it does not use any additional resources for GUI environment. The biggest gain to Server Core is the reduced attack surface. Core is designed to be small disk space and lightweight cpu therefore it is ideal to use in a VM for a simple, unattended task such as DHCP, DNS, print server, etc, almost as if it is an appliance.
You would gain little from running Core on a physical machine, on modern hardware. Depends what you do with it. Core also needs a lot less reboots because less components get windows server 2008 r2 enterprise full installation vs server core installation free download that may result in a need to reboot.
The lower restart need is the main advantage. Driver update "issues" until you find out how to acutally install new drivers properly the main disdvantage. Sign up to join this community. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top.
Stack Overflow for Teams — Collaborate and share knowledge with a private group. Create a free Team What is Teams? Learn more. Asked 11 years, 1 month ago. Active 10 years, 10 months ago. Viewed 3k times.
Improve this question. Add a comment. Active Oldest Votes. Improve this answer. Chris S Chris S Gaius Gaius 1, 1 1 gold badge 12 12 silver badges 18 18 bronze badges. TomTom TomTom Sign up or log in Sign up using Google. Sign up using Facebook. Sign up using Email and Password.
Post as a guest Name. Email Required, but never shown. The Overflow Blog. Migrating metrics from InfluxDB to M3.
Podcast Is crypto the key to a democratizing the metaverse? Featured windows server 2008 r2 enterprise full installation vs server core installation free download Meta. Reducing the weight of our footer. Upcoming responsive Activity page.
Rest in peace, Michael Hampton. Related 2. Hot Network Questions. Question feed. Server Fault works best with JavaScript enabled. Accept all cookies Customize settings.
Microsoft isn't there yetalthough Server Core is a great step ahead. Office Office Exchange Server. Not an IT pro? Windows Server TechCenter. Sign in. United States English. Ask a question. Quick access. Search related threads. Remove From My Forums. Answered by:. Archived Forums. Windows server 2008 r2 enterprise full installation vs server core installation free download Server General Forum.
Sign in to vote. Im curious how many have installed core service roles vs. I have been experimenting with core and I am not finding it as advantageous as I would have expected. As such I am curious how many others are taking advantage of this in their production environments. Tuesday, March 18, PM. Reduced attack surface - Because Server Core installations are minimal, there are fewer applications running on the server, which decreases the attack surface.
Reduced management - Because fewer applications and services are installed on a server running the Server Core installation, there is less to manage. Less disk space required - A Server Core installation requires only about 1 gigabyte GB of disk space to install and approximately 2 GB for operations after the installation. Lower risk of bugs - Reducing the amount of code can help reduce the amount of bugs. Yet MS fails once again. We just need a little more patience
